
PROPELLERS
Let's start with sailboats
It is possible, with empirical tests, to determine if a certain
propeller fit a certain boat, applying simple but reliable rules
of thumb, which can be useful for the serious yachtsman wishing
to improve performances when steering under power
Article by Antonio Bido
|
|

THE PERFECT PITCH
Most of sail boaters, use their boat in the summer time when,
nobody knows why, every course is always against the wind.
I have noticed, thanks to my 20 years experience sailing across
the Mediterranean covering more than 20.000 miles, that exist an
average ratio of 1 to 2 relating under sail and under power
mileage: one who cover 1.000 miles, has surely steamed 500 miles.
All this highlight how important it is, on sailboats to have, a
reliable and powerful engine, and to choose the correct propeller
in order to optimize enginès working condition (which will
then surely last longer).
Sails-men, unfortunately, seldom thinks about "pitch" and
"diameter", and very few know the maximum allowable rpm for their
engine, both in neutral and under way. On the other hand, the
related technical literature is not an easy-to-use reference, at
least for the average boater, and, however, it does not always
answer to all questions. In fact a universal theoretical rule to
apply to any floating body does not exist, due to the incredible
amount of factors influencing propeller selection, such as
enginès power, shaft speed, boat's dimensions and weight,
hull's geometry...
This article is not for those seeking the latest high-tech
engineering on propeller design, rather is for the self-made
yachtsman wishing to find the right propeller for his boat.
There are several different types of marine propeller, and
numerous technical terms indicate their behavior, such as: blade
section (ogival or airfoil), positive, negative or no rake,
trailing and leading edge shape and so on, but lets let them to
propeller's manufactures.
For our purpose, however, only two factors are really important:
diameter and pitch.
Diameter: it is the diameter of the circle swept across
the extreme tips of the propeller blades.
Shaft speed (usually engine rpm divided by the reduction gear
ratio) and SHP are the factors influencing the diameter. SHP
(Shaft Horse Power) is the power actually delivered from the
engine to the shaft thus to the propeller, about equal to the BHP
(Brake Horse Power, meaning the maximum engine horse power as
tested at the factory) minus about 3% of power loss at the gearbox
and 1.5% per bearing. Generally the larger the diameter the
greater the propeller efficiency.
Pitch: it is the distance a propeller drives forward for
each complete revolution, assuming it is moving trough a solid
element, just like a wood screw does. For instance, if the
propeller cover 100 millimeters per turn through a solid, then its
pitch is 100 millimeters.
There are three main propellers' families:
constant-pitch propellers
folding propellers
controllable-pitch propellers.
Constant pitch propellers: this type of propellers blades
are welded to the hub, and their pitch, as suggested by the name,
is fixed. Their structure is surely the stronger, because they are
manufactured from a single casting, usually through CAM (Computer
Aided Manufacture) assisted machinery and they have no moving
parts. Such propellers, usually have a 50 % efficiency loss in
astern motion, and are not suggested for sailboats, due to their
excessive drag under sail.
Folding propellers: they have folding blades; under sail
the hydrodynamic pressure keeps them closed, thus considerably
reducing drag. Their astern maneuverability is poor.
Controllable pitch propellers: in this type of propellers,
the user can modify the pitch, while underway, by mean of a
hydraulic mechanism or a direct mechanical linkage. Feathering
propellers, in particular, are a special controllable pitch
propeller type, ensuring low drag, because of their characteristic
blade design.
Controllable pitch propellers are very practical because by
modifying the pitch they allow for thrust optimization under
different load conditions. Most modern sailboats are fitted with
this type of propeller. Lets discover together how to use it.
For the majority of engine and propeller manufacturers the ideal
propeller will cause a loss of 5 to 10% in engine maximum
revolution per minute; if, for instance, the engine rated maximum
rpm are 3600, the loss will approximately be 200 rpm, in calm sea,
with no wind, with no overload on board and with a clean hull
bottom, while it will be about 360 rpm in rough sea, strong wind
etc...
If the total actual loss is bigger, then the propeller is
"overloaded" and so is the engine, while if the propeller is
turning too fast it is "under-loaded" and is not using all the
engine power. On the other hand someone believes that one should
keep the pitch as long as possible in order to achieve the cruse
speed at lower as possible rpm.
For example, lets suppose that a 6 knots cruise speed is reached
at 2800 rpm. Increasing the pitch (and of course keeping the
diameter constant) the same speed could be registered at 2000 rpm.
In this case, advantages are: lower engine speed, less shaft
vibration, less noise thus longer engine life.
The question is: which is the right choice?
The "high pitch and low rpm" solution , although appearing
interesting, is not the correct one. The engine is actually
running slowly, but it is overloaded thus lasting shorter, much
shorter than an engine running faster but with less "job" to do.
This is due to the higher stress concentration on the engine
pistons, crankshaft and bearings, which can lead to some serious
damage such as engine seizing. Having an "overloaded" engine and
propeller is just like someone driving on a steep mountain road on
the fifth gear instead of the third: the engine is overheated, the
speed does not increase and fuel consumption is higher.
On the other hand the "5 to 10% loss on top rpm" rule will surely
not overload the engine, while it will generate noise and the
transmission gear will be in danger. The propeller will turn
faster, thus increasing shaft and bearings vibrations.
In my experience, the ideal solution is an average of the two and
can be obtained with practical tests.
The first thing to do is to find in the owner's manual at which
rpm the engine reaches its maximum power (BHP). Lets say, for
example, that the maximum power is obtained at 3600 rpm.
Then we have to check which is the actual rpm reached by the
engine, accelerating in neutral. If a 3700/3750 rpm are achieved,
everything is fine, if not you have to adjust your revolution
counter to that value (in fact, and normally, an engine should
increase, in neutral, 3 to 4% its maximum rated rpm, because,
usually, the manufacturer takes into account the loss due to the
reduction gear). All this is applicable to all well maintained
engines, and in particular to those with clean fuel filters and
perfectly working injection system. This means, for instance, that
an engine which has lost compression will not achieve its top
rated rpm. Once the revolution counter has been verified, we can
start the trial which will allow us to know if and at what rpm our
engine is overloaded.
The sea state must be calm, and no sail should be up. Keeping a
constant route, we have to increase engine speed with a 200 rpm
step. We will plot, for each rpm range, the boat's speed, observed
at the LOG (GPS could be too inaccurate for this purpose). Speed
should increase constantly for each rpm range. Meantime, we should
check exhaust water and fumes color, which must not change. If
speed does not increase constantly or does not increase at all,
then the engine is overloaded (be sure that you have not reached
the hull speed); exhaust fumes quantity and water color will proof
the overloaded engine condition. In fact, increasing engine load,
quantity, density and color of both exhaust fumes and water will
become darker and darker, till they rich a black color, meaning
pitch is too long. In this situation, increasing rpm will not
increase speed, some of the fuel will not be burned and fuel
consumption will increase without benefits.
The same test should be carried out with rough sea and wind and
the results plotted; these will indicate if your propeller's pitch
is correct or if it should be increased or decreased.
Then lets check again the enginès owner manual, where we
will find the maximum horsepower output and the hp/rpm ratio.
Lets, now, find the best hp/rpm ratio.
We will assume our engine will deliver the maximum horsepower
output at 3600 rpm, and that a 2 hp power increase is attained for
every 500 rpm till 2800 rpm, then 1.5 hp till 3200 rpm and then 1
hp till 3600 rpm. The best hp/rpm ratio is at 2800 rpm.
We know that cruise engine speed is 20% less than its maximum
speed (3600 rpm): the closest we go to this value the better is
our propeller pitch.
For instance, if our engine has its maximum efficiency at 2800 rpm
and its maximum full ahead rpm are respectively 3500 in calm sea
and 3300 in rough sea, than our pitch is correct (3500 rpm minus
20% equals to 2800 rpm). This is true if our test result confirm
that the engine has not been overloaded in the 0 to 2800 rpm
range, otherwise the pitch has to be reduced.
I have carried out some tests with my Panda 31, a sailboat 9.60
meters LOA, fitted with a 38 centimeters diameter Max Prop, and a
Buk engine with 24 hp at 3600 rpm with its best hp/rpm ratio in
the 2400-2600 rpm range. The reduction gear ratio is 2:1, and the
hull was just dry-docked.
Tests were carried out on a distance base; mechanic Gianni Magurno
from Buk assisted me. Later I performed long distance tests,
covering more than 2000 miles and evaluating both plusses and
minuses of each solution.
Here are the results
First trial: blade angle 26°, for a 350 millimeters pitch.
Engine speeds are 2500 rpm in calm sea and 2400 in rough sea. Top
speed is 6.5 knots. Cruise speed in calm sea is 5.5 knots at 2000
rpm. The engine is noisy and clearly overloaded. At 2200 rpm,
exhaust fumes and water are dark.
Results: pitch is too large. Engine power is not completely
used and, in fact, speed do not increase in the 2200-2500 rpm
range. The boat is too fast at slower rpm. A counterblow can be
easily felt when inserting the gear.
Second trial: blade angle 20°, for a 260 millimeters pitch.
Engine speeds are respectively 3450 rpm and 3300 rpm in calm sea
and rough sea. Top speed is 7 knots. Cruise speed is 6 knots at
2800 rpm, in calm sea. A good power reserve is available in rough
sea. At cruise speed the engine is noisy. Exhaust fumes and water
are dark at 3400 rpm.
Results: the pitch is in accordance with the famous "5 to
10% loss on top rpm" rule. In fact the rpm loss is respectively 5%
in calm sea and 10% in rough sea. Now the engine is less loaded,
cruise speed has gained half a knot, but it is achieved at 2800
rpm, thus increasing noise and vibrations. The enginès best
hp/rpm ratio is not achieved.
Third trial: blade angle 22°, for a 290 millimeters pitch.
Engine speed is 3200 rpm in calm sea and 3000 in rough sea. Cruise
speed, in calm sea, is 6 knots at 2600 rpm. Speed increase
constantly till 2800 rpm, for a maximum speed of 6.5 knots. Dark
exhaust fumes and water appear above 3000 rpm.
Results: among the three sea trial, the best one was the
third, which feature the higher speeds, especially in calm sea.
Optimum sound and vibration limits were achieved. In rough sea I
would have appreciate more power reserve; however even on most
severe conditions I never had to run above 2700 rpm, and just in
case I got some help from the jib.
In closing, the purpose of this exercise is to give suggestions to
those yachtsmen wishing to identify their boat's most appropriate
pitch, to suit their own requirements.
Now all you need to do is try, without forgetting attention and
patience. Have fun!
|